Lea Ma vs Victoria Flores Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 08:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Ma vs V. Flores

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ma 1 - 0 Flores
They have played 3 sets in total, with Lea Ma winning 2 and Victoria Flores winning 1. The last match between Lea Ma and Victoria Flores was at the W35 San Rafael, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Lea Ma getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ma | 1 |
| Flores | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 San Rafael(10-01-25)
L. Ma vs V. Flores H2H Profile
L. Ma vs V. Flores Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Lea Ma has secured 40.99% of points on her second serve, while Victoria Flores achieved 44.23%. Could this indicate a slight advantage for Flores?
- Return Game Stats: Lea Ma won 50.98% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Flores' 51.92%. On first serve returns, Lea Ma recorded 30.71%, slightly trailing Flores' 31.19%. So, who has the upper hand in returning? Flores marginally does.
- Under Pressure: In saving breakpoints under pressure, Lea Ma has been successful 46.15% of the time, slightly outperforming Flores at 44.68%. Does this hint at Ma's resilience in critical moments?
- Performance Overview: In the previous year, Lea Ma has a 62.30% win rate (38/23), whereas Flores has a higher win rate of 71.43% (5/2). Which player seems more consistent? Flores does.
- Best Surface Performance: Both players excel on hard surfaces, each with a 64% win rate. Lea Ma struggles most on grass with 0%, and Flores on clay with 50%. Does this convey any particular advantage in potential surface suitability?
- Player Level: Both compete largely in Challengers/ITF events >$10K, with Ma winning 63.33% and Flores 71.43% of those matches. Who is showing superior performance at this level? Flores, based on percentage.
- Opponent Quality: Lea Ma's opponents had an average rank of 404.74, whereas Flores faced opponents averaging a rank of 655.57. Would this suggest Ma has faced tougher competition?
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match reaches a deciding set, Ma has a 47% success rate, while Flores remains perfect with 100%. Could this indicate potential pressure performance for Flores?
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
Both Lea Ma and Victoria Flores show strengths in different aspects of their recent performances. Ma exhibits resilience in saving breakpoints, indicating she can handle pressure well. Nonetheless, Victoria Flores has demonstrated slightly superior performance in returning serves and winning matches overall in the past year.
Flores' higher win rate and perfect record in deciding sets could prove crucial if the match becomes closely contested. Additionally, the quality of opponents faced by Ma suggests she has competed against stronger players, yet Flores' consistent performance cannot be overlooked.
Considering these factors, including her strong performance on hard surfaces and superior match record, Victoria Flores is the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Lea Ma vs Victoria Flores Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Ma vs V. Flores H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:29:32 | Average Match Time | 2:29:32 |
| 57% (48/84) | 1st Serve % | 67% (58/87) |
| 71% (34/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (32/58) |
| 47% (17/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
| 47% (41/87) | Return Points Win % | 39% (33/84) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Ma Recent Matches Played
V. Flores Recent Matches Played

L. Ma vs V. Flores Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.66% (99/59) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.41% (66/51) |
| 62.11% (218/133) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.58% (142/123) |
| 55.85% (1770/1399) | Games Win/Loss | 51.37% (1235/1169) |
| 64.22% (70/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.29% (41/27) |
| 59.46% (22/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (21/21) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 398 | Aces Total | 57 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 295 | Total Double Faults | 180 |
| 1:33:38 | Average Match Time | 1:3:22 |
| 438.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 201.26 |
| 58% (5275/9066) | 1st Serve % | 67% (3114/4642) |
| 65% (3442/5275) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1842/3114) |
| 48% (1831/3790) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (705/1528) |
| 50% (608/1226) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (238/482) |
| 47% (4503/9598) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1881/4314) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63.16% (96/56) | Challenger W/L | 56.32% (49/38) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Futures W/L | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 66% (99/149) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (63/113) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (14/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (11/19) |
| 57% (23/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (20/31) |
| 87% (106/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (62/58) |
| 12% (106/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (62/4) |
| 15% (52/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (55/8) |